In these cases courts lift the corporate veil to make members liable for the actions of the company. If a court pierces a companys corporate veil, the owners, shareholders, or members of a corporation or llc can be held personally liable for corporate debts. What happens when a piercing the corporate veil occurs. It has long been established that the courts can in certain circumstances disregard the separate legal personality of a company from the shareholders. Numerous cases have set out various legal tests for the very limited circumstances in which this doctrine may be invoked by the courts. However, in limited circumstances, if the corporation is not properly operated, the corporate veil can be pierced. Piercing the corporate veilby herbert smith llp and plc dispute resolutionrelated contentthe high court has held that the corporate veil should not be pierced to allow contractual claims to proceed against noncontracting parties. Rogowski, g 1999, company law in modern europe, dartmouth publication, sudbury, ma. The three justifications for piercing the corporate veil. The companies had legal title to real estate within the uk, including the couples matrimonial home. Uk supreme court confirms corporate veil can be pierced in. However, the uk courts rarely respond to this issue. In qatar the circumstances where the piercing of the corporate veil is possible may not be so.
Piercing the corporate veil business rescue expert. For simplicity, this article will use piercing of the corporate veil to encompass both. The new law of piercing the corporate veil in the uk. D avid bloom writes for the solicitors journal on this difficult topic relating to the proceeds of crime act the proceeds of crime act 2002 poca, which underpins the confiscation process in england and. It generally only happens when there is wrongdoing by the peopleperson in control. The concept of limited liability within uk company law generally prevents this. The term piercing the corporate veil means disregarding the separate personality of a company and occurs when the court applies an exception to the rule in saloman v. Lifting the corporate veil uk law in the event of company insolvency. In the divorce proceedings mrs prest obtained an order from. A comparative analysis of us, german and uk veilpiercing approaches. Exceptions to this rule are made where a company becomes insolvent, in which case the veil can be lifted in certain circumstances. This paper is written as a comparative study of the development of the corporate veil piercing doctrine throughout the years. Piercing the corporate veil under the new companies act.
It is a well established principle that a company has a separate legal personality from its members. Lord walker considered piercing the corporate veil was simply a label, often used indiscriminately, to describe the disparate occasions on which some rule. Corporations are separate entities from their shareholders, and in normal circumstances, if a corporation is sued, the individual shareholders and. In the united kingdom, the corporate veil doctrine is generally called lifting of the corporate veil as opposed to piercing of the corporate veil. This article explains the concept of piercing the corporate veil doctrine which is widely recognised in common law countries. Piercing the corporate veil among affiliated companies in the european community and in the us. In the united kingdom, the process of distinguishing the company from its members started a. The unanimous judgment of the supreme court in petrodel resources ltd v. Section 218 of the 2008 companies act extends liability, while s 209 codifies the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil.
Piercing the corporate veil recent developments, mondaq corporate company law, vol. This is known as piercing or lifting the corporate veil. We find that uk and german courts have in recent years taken a more restrictive approach to veil piercing, in part for the reasons outlined above. Free practical law trialto access this resource, sign up for a free trial of practical law. True veilpiercing is defined by lord sumption as disregarding the separate legal personality and identifying the company with its controlling. They try to save the corporate legal entity in all most all the cases, even if it is necessary to lift corporate veil to ensure justice. The new law of piercing the corporate veil in the uk in. The corporate veil exists to distinguish a company as a legal person separate from its shareholders. This means creditors can go after the owners home, bank account, investments, and other assets to satisfy the corporate debt. In very limited circumstances, the english courts can pierce the corporate veil, putting to one side the companys separate legal personality and holding that its members are subject to the legal consequences of the companys acts. This undermines the notion that salomon occupies the centre stage in corporate. Counsel for the defendants in vtb capital described piercing the corporate veil as a convenient label which is used to identify cases in which the courts have granted relief which involves, or perhaps more accurately appears at first blush to involve disregarding the principle in salomon. The effect of lifting or piercing the corporate veil is that the shareholders, rather than the company, are regarded as the relevant actors on whom liability of the obligations of the company are placed.
This note discusses the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil, primarily in the context of the parentsubsidiary relationship. Although it is very rare that piercing of the corporate veil is allowed, there. Cases and articles have been used to set out the main principles in which the law is based. There is a veil separating the corporate legal entity and the people running it, which prevents the latter from being responsible for the companys liabilities. In conducting the research for their paper, which is titled the three justifications for piercing the corporate veil, macey and mitts performed a sophisticated data analysis on more than 9,000 opinions in search of instances where plaintiffs succeeding in uncovering the owners behind a. Piercing the corporate veil or lifting the corporate veil is a legal decision to treat the rights or duties of a corporation as the rights or liabilities of its shareholders. It explains the two primary arguments used to prove piercing claims, the alter ego theory and the agency theory, and examines what. The corporate veil in the uk is, however, capable of being lifted, so that the people who run the company are treated as being liable for its debts, or can benefit from its rights, in a very limited number of circumstances defined by the courts. Usually a corporation is treated as a separate legal person, which is solely responsible for the debts it incurs and the sole beneficiary of the credit it is owed. The common law notion of piercing the corporate veil is applied to protect the interests of a companys creditors. The corporate veil in the united kingdom is a metaphorical reference used in uk company law. Pdf approach of the uk court in piercing corporate veil. England and wales was written and submitted by your fellow student.
It explains the two primary arguments used to prove piercing claims, the alter ego theory and the agency theory, and examines what parent companies can do to limit their exposure to the liabilities of their subsidiaries. It highlights some fundamental differences between the. Generally, the doctrine allows the extension of liability for a. Piercing or lifting the corporate veil gives an opportunity to look behind, so called, measures of the company and see which members of the company are liable and no longer covered by the corporate shell. The recent case of caterpillar financial services uk limited v saenz corp limited. The neverending mess agustin ricardo spotorno summary. Lord neuberger, who gave the courts judgment on piercing the corporate veil in vtb capital, agreed with lord sumption that cases fall into two types, concealment and evasion. In many instances this proviso also aims to combat fraud, which is in the public interest. However, where the relevant test has been satisfied, the courts have shown a willingness to pierce the veil. Definition and analysis of piercing the corporate veil. These exceptional circumstances can be referred to lifting or piercing the corporate veil. The claimant in that case sought to pierce the corporate veil in order to bring proceedings in england against an individual based overseas mr lembergs who. Continuing to trade and incur further debts when the company is insolvent and cannot be rescued. This article undertakes a comparative study of the piercing of corporate veil doctrines under u.
Predictability and certainty are the distinctive features of english law as one of the leading choices to govern commercial contracts worldwide. The concept of the corporate veil dates back to the landmark decision of the house of lords in salomon v a salomon and co ltd ac 22, where the legal separation between a company and its shareholders was established. In this essay, an attempt has been made to explain the reluctance nature of the uk courts. This presentation will discuss the origins of piercing the corporate veil, as well as provide background on how the corporate veil can be pierced. Author corporate finance lab posted on march 18, 2019 april 2, 2019 categories in english, eu law, liquidation tags competition law, economic continuity, economic unity, group liability, piercing the corporate veil, skanska, successor liability, undertaking 1 comment on the cjeu vantaan kaupunki case. However, there are several exceptions to this principle. Corporate veils are only pierced when the shareholders or owners use the corporation in a fraudulent manner, or they fail to separate the business assets from their own. The countries examined are the united kingdom, singapore and the united states which are common law jurisdictions, as well as the civil law. As a business owner, it is possible to pierce the corporate veil by not adhering to the formalities of owning a corporation. The effect of lifting or piercing the corporate veil is that the shareholders, rather than the company, are regarded as the relevant actors on whom liability of the. Comparison of the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil. Given that the piercing of the corporate veil is a matter for judicial discretion, it is submitted that courts should do so sparingly or risk undermining certainty and predictability in corporate decisionmaking and denying natural justice to directors.
A comparative study of the history and development of the veil piercing doctrine including the contemporary trends in uk and the us, assessing the status of the doctrine abstract this paper is written as a comparative study of the development of the corporate veil piercing doctrine throughout the years. Despite dismissing the appeal in so far as it relied on piercing the veil of incorporation, the uks most senior judges went out of their way to acknowledge the existence of a general exception to the rule, based on the socalled evasion principle. Approach of the uk court in piercing corporate veil by. Analysis of the development is done by looking at the veil piercing doctrines under u. Pdf piercing the corporate veil doctrine in poland. The insulation from corporate debts is known as the corporate veil. This article summarises the principles by which a court may pierce the corporate veil in cases of fraud in light of recent case law.
Piercing the corporate veil, also known as lifting the corporate veil, is a term often used by parties seeking to pursue the directors personally, in the event of corporate insolvency. German courts in particular see tort law as a more appropriate mode of resolving issues that in other jurisdictions are seen through the lens of. Eu sustainability goals and the role of reporting under the nonfinancial reporting directive. In my view, the principle that the court may be justified in piercing the corporate veil if a companys separate legal personality is being abused for the purpose of some relevant wrongdoing is well established in. The courts often express their reluctance to lift the corporate veil. Therefore, the salomon principle remains an important part of corporate law today. Slaughter and may piercing the corporate veil and fraud. Introduction when carrying on business, seeking an appropriate corporate structure which accommodates to the needs of the intended business and lifting the corporate veil uk law. The regulation of outsider trading in eu and the us.
1200 16 788 302 172 463 220 592 361 1308 1366 1615 872 1482 407 741 1034 829 734 581 437 1187 1331 264 735 989 135 1048 616 427 220 36 1441 718 1020 21 1232 1025 136